When I do I'll look for examples of supportĪlso, the NHL average CA in TBL 8.2 is 138 and a 4th liner/fringe player is in the high 120s, so a 120+ or -7 player is a fringe player who "might, at best" be an average NHL player (they'll never be a top 6 F/top 4 D) I've got three "regen tests" going right now, two are in 2025 (heading towards 2035/2045) but I haven't compiled the data yet It really takes the fun out of the draft.Īnd in online leagues, it makes the teams that have great young players in 2016 great for a decade to come. We see to many top players with 18 shooting and 18 deflections and then like 8 passing and 8 checking. Good players should be more likely to have all-around ratings. The prospects this game develop all look like Mark Ribeiro (all offense, no defense) or Johnny Oduya (all defense, no offense). In the DB, players like Crosby or Malkin or even lesser players like Komarov. The speed at which players develop needs to be tweaked so they develop a little faster.ģ) Prospects are too specialized. Also, top 5 and even #1 picks are virtually useless in the NHL. If a player is at a threshold of -7 or better (or 120+) there should be a minimum level of physical ability.Ģ) Players take too long to develop. There aren't many top flight players with 6 speed and or 8 stamina. 1) Going back to the original NHL EHM, too many good prospects have really bad physical ratings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |